<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When SEO&#8217;s Attack.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jumping in the middle of a SEO cat fight. - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Jumping in the middle of a SEO cat fight. - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-990</guid>
		<description>[...] We should learn from each other - not attack each other. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We should learn from each other - not attack each other. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Facts About Chuck Norris &#187; JasonHendricks.com - Internet Marketing and E-Commerce Consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Facts About Chuck Norris &#187; JasonHendricks.com - Internet Marketing and E-Commerce Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 23:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-977</guid>
		<description>[...] With all of the recent infighting, bickering, and other seriousness in the SEO community, I thought it would be appropriate to share what I feel is one of the funniest things I&#8217;ve seen in a long time. As someone that grew up watching Chuck Norris movies and every other movie related to martial arts (the Bruce Lee collection comes to mind), this site had me laughing out loud for a very, very, long time. Once I started reading I couldn&#8217;t stop and ended up reading all 100 of the top random facts about Chuck Norris. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With all of the recent infighting, bickering, and other seriousness in the SEO community, I thought it would be appropriate to share what I feel is one of the funniest things I&#8217;ve seen in a long time. As someone that grew up watching Chuck Norris movies and every other movie related to martial arts (the Bruce Lee collection comes to mind), this site had me laughing out loud for a very, very, long time. Once I started reading I couldn&#8217;t stop and ended up reading all 100 of the top random facts about Chuck Norris. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 01:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-962</guid>
		<description>Seos are a lot sneakier than most when it comes to attacks. And the attacks are often done in a lasting and vicious manner. Ever since I've started in the business, there hasn't been a day without senseless wars all around me regarding who has more expertise or who knows more. We are all following the search engines, so get real seos. The goal should be to establish a strong web presence overall and not to bend over for anyone to keep your websites up there for yet another day.

- Mike Dammann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seos are a lot sneakier than most when it comes to attacks. And the attacks are often done in a lasting and vicious manner. Ever since I&#8217;ve started in the business, there hasn&#8217;t been a day without senseless wars all around me regarding who has more expertise or who knows more. We are all following the search engines, so get real seos. The goal should be to establish a strong web presence overall and not to bend over for anyone to keep your websites up there for yet another day.</p>
<p>- Mike Dammann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron wall</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 05:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-953</guid>
		<description>I took a tip from Doug and stopped hanging around spammers like Aaron Wall. Then everything started to make sense. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a tip from Doug and stopped hanging around spammers like Aaron Wall. Then everything started to make sense. <img src='http://www.jimboykin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Infighting - SEOBUZZBOX.COM</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Infighting - SEOBUZZBOX.COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-947</guid>
		<description>[...] I read and interesting post done by Jim Boykin who has been amusing me lately in his blog titled “When SEO’s Attack”. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I read and interesting post done by Jim Boykin who has been amusing me lately in his blog titled “When SEO’s Attack”. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-933</guid>
		<description>I guess I've always assumed that the best way to go about responding to an attack is come up with something that makes it evident that the attacker is a stupid jerk, but without attacking them directly.

ie, someone says:

"Jim, you suck."

and you respond:

"Thanks for the comment.  I'm not sure what you were trying to say, since you obviously misspelled that last word.  'You duck?'  As in, I'm really good at letting things roll of my back?  'You cluck?' As in sometimes I say nutty things?  'I worship the ground you walk on'?  Sorry, but I really don't deserve any special praise from you..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;ve always assumed that the best way to go about responding to an attack is come up with something that makes it evident that the attacker is a stupid jerk, but without attacking them directly.</p>
<p>ie, someone says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Jim, you suck.&#8221;</p>
<p>and you respond:</p>
<p>&#8220;Thanks for the comment.  I&#8217;m not sure what you were trying to say, since you obviously misspelled that last word.  &#8216;You duck?&#8217;  As in, I&#8217;m really good at letting things roll of my back?  &#8216;You cluck?&#8217; As in sometimes I say nutty things?  &#8216;I worship the ground you walk on&#8217;?  Sorry, but I really don&#8217;t deserve any special praise from you&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-928</guid>
		<description>Well, John, I guess this gets into the difference between attack / counterattack and simple debate and difference of opinion. Of course, one can be mistaken for the other, and sometimes a jab in good fun is  worthwhile (though once more, can be mistaken). 

Of course, flaming can go a bit far. Frankly, halfway through Jim's post I couldn't help but think of the "Arguing on the Internet" picture (do a GIS on that phrase if you don't know what I'm talking about).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, John, I guess this gets into the difference between attack / counterattack and simple debate and difference of opinion. Of course, one can be mistaken for the other, and sometimes a jab in good fun is  worthwhile (though once more, can be mistaken). </p>
<p>Of course, flaming can go a bit far. Frankly, halfway through Jim&#8217;s post I couldn&#8217;t help but think of the &#8220;Arguing on the Internet&#8221; picture (do a GIS on that phrase if you don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m talking about).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>John Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/when-seos-attack/#comment-926</guid>
		<description>There are lots of reasons to attack. The most obvious is, they attack when attacked. I've let a lot of criticisms go, but I also respond to a some criticisms when I feel a response is necessary. 

Sometimes attacking somebody is the pompous thing to do. You know, generate controversy, make it look like your opinion counts. 

And sometimes it's the right thing to do. You know, moral integrity. Traffic Power comes to mind. 

All in all, I really don't see the virtue in getting along. Much more virtue in open debate than there is in pandering to the establishment, IMO.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of reasons to attack. The most obvious is, they attack when attacked. I&#8217;ve let a lot of criticisms go, but I also respond to a some criticisms when I feel a response is necessary. </p>
<p>Sometimes attacking somebody is the pompous thing to do. You know, generate controversy, make it look like your opinion counts. </p>
<p>And sometimes it&#8217;s the right thing to do. You know, moral integrity. Traffic Power comes to mind. </p>
<p>All in all, I really don&#8217;t see the virtue in getting along. Much more virtue in open debate than there is in pandering to the establishment, IMO.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
