<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What if a Human Reviewer Looked at your Backlinks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimboykin.com/what-if-a-human-reviewer-looked-at-your-backlinks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/what-if-a-human-reviewer-looked-at-your-backlinks/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eee</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/what-if-a-human-reviewer-looked-at-your-backlinks/#comment-33043</link>
		<dc:creator>eee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/?p=455#comment-33043</guid>
		<description>oh, and these sites rank in 2 months flat most of the time.  they are probably reinvesting in longer term linking strategies with the quick profits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and these sites rank in 2 months flat most of the time.  they are probably reinvesting in longer term linking strategies with the quick profits</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eee</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/what-if-a-human-reviewer-looked-at-your-backlinks/#comment-33042</link>
		<dc:creator>eee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/?p=455#comment-33042</guid>
		<description>why is it then that large amounts of sites in the most competative niches continue using paid links in the thousands, and continue to rank indefintely?

no, I wont report them.  thats googles job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is it then that large amounts of sites in the most competative niches continue using paid links in the thousands, and continue to rank indefintely?</p>
<p>no, I wont report them.  thats googles job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dw</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/what-if-a-human-reviewer-looked-at-your-backlinks/#comment-33023</link>
		<dc:creator>dw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/?p=455#comment-33023</guid>
		<description>I agree completely.  If a link can't pass a human review then it's worthless IMO, even if it's currently helping you rank higher (cause if you get penalized that'll kill you, even if you have some natural links).  Google will only get better as time goes on, not worse, no point spending time building links that won't be worth anything next year and beyond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely.  If a link can&#8217;t pass a human review then it&#8217;s worthless IMO, even if it&#8217;s currently helping you rank higher (cause if you get penalized that&#8217;ll kill you, even if you have some natural links).  Google will only get better as time goes on, not worse, no point spending time building links that won&#8217;t be worth anything next year and beyond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/what-if-a-human-reviewer-looked-at-your-backlinks/#comment-32978</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 07:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/?p=455#comment-32978</guid>
		<description>egg on your face Tyler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>egg on your face Tyler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Dewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/what-if-a-human-reviewer-looked-at-your-backlinks/#comment-32931</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Dewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/?p=455#comment-32931</guid>
		<description>LOL TOOOOOOOOOOO FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought you was pulling a prank I seriously did. That was good  one I was setting there thinking man if this site is linking to there site they are damn good at creating good sites and then I got to thinking if they did have a link from that site they had one site that was very deceptive (not in a bad way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL TOOOOOOOOOOO FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>I thought you was pulling a prank I seriously did. That was good  one I was setting there thinking man if this site is linking to there site they are damn good at creating good sites and then I got to thinking if they did have a link from that site they had one site that was very deceptive (not in a bad way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
