Comments on: Tons of sites going “Supplemental Results”. http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/ Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building. Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:19:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Sherry Kirchenbauer http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1580 Sherry Kirchenbauer Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:02:02 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1580 Hello. I know there hasn't been much discussion about the Supplemental Results. I read GoogleGuy's post and sent an email to the email in his post, but I received a reply stating, "We're sorry, but this mailbox has been retired and is no longer actively monitored." Several weeks ago, I had discovered that my website (www.noahsanimalfigurines.com) has 2,349 supplemental results and one actual result (the home page). I waited to see if the problem had been corrected, but it has not. Does anyone know where I can get information on fixing this? Of course, I can't write to Google Support because I only receive generic replies. Thanks! Sherry Hello. I know there hasn’t been much discussion about the Supplemental Results. I read GoogleGuy’s post and sent an email to the email in his post, but I received a reply stating, “We’re sorry, but this mailbox has been retired and is no longer actively monitored.”

Several weeks ago, I had discovered that my website (www.noahsanimalfigurines.com) has 2,349 supplemental results and one actual result (the home page). I waited to see if the problem had been corrected, but it has not.

Does anyone know where I can get information on fixing this? Of course, I can’t write to Google Support because I only receive generic replies.

Thanks!
Sherry

]]> By: GoogleGuy on Supplemental Result Problem. - Jim Boykin’s Internet Marketing Blog http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1306 GoogleGuy on Supplemental Result Problem. - Jim Boykin’s Internet Marketing Blog Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:36:04 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1306 [...] I know it’s only been 3 days since I last posted on "Tons of sites going “Supplemental Results"- but I should post an update. [...] [...] I know it’s only been 3 days since I last posted on "Tons of sites going “Supplemental Results"- but I should post an update. [...]

]]> By: graywolf http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1293 graywolf Sat, 04 Mar 2006 14:43:23 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1293 Man that is strange, but some of the examples in DP make me feel a little better. Man that is strange, but some of the examples in DP make me feel a little better.

]]> By: Brian Turner http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1292 Brian Turner Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:17:29 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1292 It got mentioned at Threadwatch and DigitalPoint: http://www.threadwatch.org/node/5780 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=62256 What I find interesting is the nonsense URLs - a possible clue to part of what's going on. It got mentioned at Threadwatch and DigitalPoint:
http://www.threadwatch.org/node/5780
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=62256

What I find interesting is the nonsense URLs - a possible clue to part of what’s going on.

]]> By: John Colascione http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1287 John Colascione Sat, 04 Mar 2006 03:22:04 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1287 Well, I am another one that is very glad to see that this is being discussed now.... At first, I really thought I had done somethign wrong, but it's growing rapidly and affecting many people and it doesn't seem to be related to anything in particular that I can spot.. All different sites, different themes, and ages. Well, I am another one that is very glad to see that this is being discussed now…. At first, I really thought I had done somethign wrong, but it’s growing rapidly and affecting many people and it doesn’t seem to be related to anything in particular that I can spot..

All different sites, different themes, and ages.

]]> By: Tom Forrest http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1286 Tom Forrest Sat, 04 Mar 2006 03:09:22 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1286 Hey Jim, You look like you were having a great time at SES. Good for you. Best regards, Tom Forrest Hey Jim,

You look like you were having a great time at SES.

Good for you.

Best regards,

Tom Forrest

]]> By: Tom Forrest http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1285 Tom Forrest Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:55:59 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1285 Hello, I am glad you bought this up. Yes it is happening. Google has a defect and does not know it yet or knows it and will not admit it. I see many high quality sites with good content just being wiped out. Tom Forrest Hello,

I am glad you bought this up.

Yes it is happening. Google has a defect and does not know it yet or knows it and will not admit it.

I see many high quality sites with good content just being wiped out.

Tom Forrest

]]> By: Maxim http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1278 Maxim Fri, 03 Mar 2006 21:31:39 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/tons-of-sites-going-supplemental-results/#comment-1278 >>Is this a BigDaddy Fluke? I think so... As in January 4, Matt Cutts guessed the transition length for 1-2 months... It's time now. >>Is this a BigDaddy Fluke?
I think so… As in January 4, Matt Cutts guessed the transition length for 1-2 months… It’s time now.

]]>