<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The big secret to Ranking #1 in Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: flippinsweet</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>flippinsweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 04:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post, Jim. I know EXACTLY the site you are talking about. But instead of stumbling around trying to accidentally find these sites, how do you do a general SEARCH for websites that have a very high number of indexed pages (for example 10,000+)?

Obviously if you have a few domain names you can do the site:domain query to determine the number of pages indexed for that particular site, but what if you are searching for the highly indexed domains from scratch?

How can you do the research to find these rather large sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post, Jim. I know EXACTLY the site you are talking about. But instead of stumbling around trying to accidentally find these sites, how do you do a general SEARCH for websites that have a very high number of indexed pages (for example 10,000+)?</p>
<p>Obviously if you have a few domain names you can do the site:domain query to determine the number of pages indexed for that particular site, but what if you are searching for the highly indexed domains from scratch?</p>
<p>How can you do the research to find these rather large sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: posicionamiento web &#187; Uso de las granjas de links como armas</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>posicionamiento web &#187; Uso de las granjas de links como armas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>[...] Para finalizar, decir que no todos los buscadores trabajan igual a la hora de posicionar un site en sus índices, con lo cual, lo que un buscador puede calificar de spam, otro buscador lo puede calificar positivamente. Podéis leer un ejemplo en el siguiente post, en el cual se explica como un número muy elevado de backlinks puede colocar un site en la primera posición de Yahoo, y en cambio hacerlo desaparecer del índice de Google.    &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Para finalizar, decir que no todos los buscadores trabajan igual a la hora de posicionar un site en sus índices, con lo cual, lo que un buscador puede calificar de spam, otro buscador lo puede calificar positivamente. Podéis leer un ejemplo en el siguiente post, en el cual se explica como un número muy elevado de backlinks puede colocar un site en la primera posición de Yahoo, y en cambio hacerlo desaparecer del índice de Google.    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn Solstad</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn Solstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 07:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>I see the same thing. Sitewides do wonders in Yahoo. I have not seen any evidence that sitewides harm the rankings in Google though. But, that could of course be a coinsidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the same thing. Sitewides do wonders in Yahoo. I have not seen any evidence that sitewides harm the rankings in Google though. But, that could of course be a coinsidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Presell Page Man</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator>Presell Page Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 23:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1329</guid>
		<description>hmmm... maybe I should register "Sitewideman.com" for those guys optimizing for Yahoo &#38; MSN :-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm&#8230; maybe I should register &#8220;Sitewideman.com&#8221; for those guys optimizing for Yahoo &amp; MSN :-))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Dies und das</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Dies und das</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>[...] Nach 2 Tage krank im Bett hab ich mich grade mal durch Bloglines gekämpft. Ist aber nichts wirklich spannendes passiert. Ein paar Meldungen die ich ganz lesenswert fand: US-Markt für Online-Werbung wächst um 30 Prozent Safeguarding yourself when purchasing a site for AdSense The big secret to Ranking #1 in Yahoo Google plant Laufwerk &#8216;G:&#8217;? Google GDrive Makes the Network Your Computer GoogleGuy on Supplemental Result Problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nach 2 Tage krank im Bett hab ich mich grade mal durch Bloglines gekämpft. Ist aber nichts wirklich spannendes passiert. Ein paar Meldungen die ich ganz lesenswert fand: US-Markt für Online-Werbung wächst um 30 Prozent Safeguarding yourself when purchasing a site for AdSense The big secret to Ranking #1 in Yahoo Google plant Laufwerk &#8216;G:&#8217;? Google GDrive Makes the Network Your Computer GoogleGuy on Supplemental Result Problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Westergren</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Westergren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>Interesting.

It is similar as MSN. Huge sitewides make a big difference. I think Google counts 5 and rest devalued or something.

I find it hard to get results in Google with clients that has new sites, it takes time ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>It is similar as MSN. Huge sitewides make a big difference. I think Google counts 5 and rest devalued or something.</p>
<p>I find it hard to get results in Google with clients that has new sites, it takes time &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esoos</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>esoos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>Google? Yahoo? pffft... these days most of my traffic seems to be coming from Ask (at least for a few more days)

http://www.ask.com/web?q=why+is+jeeves+gone
http://www.ask.com/web?q=where+has+jeeves+gone

Not sure why it worked out that way, exactly.  Pretty sure I'm neither a hub nor an authority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google? Yahoo? pffft&#8230; these days most of my traffic seems to be coming from Ask (at least for a few more days)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ask.com/web?q=why+is+jeeves+gone" rel="nofollow nofollow">http://www.ask.com/web?q=why+is+jeeves+gone</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ask.com/web?q=where+has+jeeves+gone" rel="nofollow nofollow">http://www.ask.com/web?q=where+has+jeeves+gone</a></p>
<p>Not sure why it worked out that way, exactly.  Pretty sure I&#8217;m neither a hub nor an authority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IrishWonder</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>IrishWonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 00:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/the-big-secret-to-ranking-1-in-yahoo/#comment-1295</guid>
		<description>Funny indeed how Google and Yahoo recognize their own ads on siters but don't recognize each other's... Had a few laughs about it recently, like Google alerts bringing sites with YPN ads, etc... As for sitewides - make a difference between the actual sitewide links and purchased links - Google seems to dislike even single occurences of purchased links nowadays when they know they're purchased - while with sitewides, they just count them all as one instead of 1,000...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny indeed how Google and Yahoo recognize their own ads on siters but don&#8217;t recognize each other&#8217;s&#8230; Had a few laughs about it recently, like Google alerts bringing sites with YPN ads, etc&#8230; As for sitewides - make a difference between the actual sitewide links and purchased links - Google seems to dislike even single occurences of purchased links nowadays when they know they&#8217;re purchased - while with sitewides, they just count them all as one instead of 1,000&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
