Comments on: Why that site with 50 backlinks beats your site with 1000 backlinks. http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/ Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building. Mon, 12 May 2008 10:56:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Website traits Google finds freakin’ AWESOME! | Brisbane SEO Blog http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-30658 Website traits Google finds freakin’ AWESOME! | Brisbane SEO Blog Mon, 12 May 2008 06:31:56 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-30658 [...] Boykin has a great article on his site about Why that site with 50 backlinks beats your site with 1000 backlinks where he quotes: It’s not always “He with the most links” who wins the game……often, “He [...] [...] Boykin has a great article on his site about Why that site with 50 backlinks beats your site with 1000 backlinks where he quotes: It’s not always “He with the most links” who wins the game……often, “He [...]

]]> By: 66 Ways to Build Links in 2008 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29810 66 Ways to Build Links in 2008 Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:53:36 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29810 [...] 1. Write an authority article. (Without a doubt the best way to gain deep links.) 101 Ways to Build Link Popularity in 2006 40 SEM 2006 Predictions Why that site with 50 backlinks beats your site with 1000 backlinks 10 Mistakes that Will KILL a Forum [...] [...] 1. Write an authority article. (Without a doubt the best way to gain deep links.) 101 Ways to Build Link Popularity in 2006 40 SEM 2006 Predictions Why that site with 50 backlinks beats your site with 1000 backlinks 10 Mistakes that Will KILL a Forum [...]

]]> By: The Best known ways to build links, and traffic 2008 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29742 The Best known ways to build links, and traffic 2008 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:53:10 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29742 [...] Why that site with 50 buacklinks beats your site with 1000 backlinks (Jim Boykin) [...] [...] Why that site with 50 buacklinks beats your site with 1000 backlinks (Jim Boykin) [...]

]]> By: mido http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29632 mido Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:36:50 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29632 تحديات العصر والبطاله اصبحت البطاله من تحديات العصر للحكومات واصبحت علي قائمه الاجنده الخاصه بالحكومات ولكن السؤال الذي يطرح نفسه وبشده هل نسب البطاله حقيقيه ام مجرد ابحاث قام بها مجموعه من الباحثين المهتمين بالارقام انا في اعتقادي الشخصي ان مشكله البطاله مشكله عالميه وغير خاصه بالوطن العربي ولكن المشكله في الوطن العربي هو عدم توافر اسلوب للحوار بين السوق والعاملين اي انه لا توجد قاعده معلوماتيه توفير للمتخرج او الطالب احتاجات السوق من العماله او الدراسات التي لابد ان يلتحق بها ليصبح معد لسوق العمل وكذالك الحكومه تفقد المعلومات عن احتياجات السوق فتكون النتيجه تكدس السوق في احد المجالات وعدم توافر فر عمل في هذا المجال في الوقت نفسه يفقد السوق عماله في مجالات اخري وتصبح عمله نادره ومن المشاكل الاخري ايضا ان تفقد الحكومه احساس الموقع والمتاخ فليس من المعقول ان تكون دوله تعتمد علي الصيد وتهتم الحكومه بالخرجين في مجال الزراعه وتدعم الصناعات الزراعيه ولذالك يدخل المناخ والموقع كعامل مشترك في دعم سوق العمل والاتمام بالمجالات التي تساعد علي النهوض بالبيئه ومن اكبر المشاكل ايضا ان يفقد الاتصال بين الشركات والعاملين فعند توفر فرصه عمل في احدي الشركات لايستطيع العامل الحصول عليها وذالك لجهله بعدم وجود فرصه عمل "وقل اعملوا فسيرا الله عملكم ورسوله والمومنين" www.today-jobs.com تحديات العصر والبطاله
اصبحت البطاله من تحديات العصر للحكومات واصبحت علي قائمه الاجنده الخاصه
بالحكومات ولكن السؤال الذي يطرح نفسه وبشده هل نسب البطاله حقيقيه ام مجرد ابحاث قام بها مجموعه من الباحثين المهتمين
بالارقام انا في اعتقادي الشخصي ان مشكله البطاله مشكله عالميه وغير خاصه بالوطن العربي ولكن المشكله في الوطن العربي
هو عدم توافر اسلوب للحوار بين السوق والعاملين اي انه لا توجد قاعده معلوماتيه توفير للمتخرج
او الطالب احتاجات السوق من العماله او الدراسات التي لابد ان يلتحق بها ليصبح معد لسوق العمل
وكذالك الحكومه تفقد المعلومات عن احتياجات السوق فتكون النتيجه تكدس السوق في احد المجالات
وعدم توافر فر عمل في هذا المجال في الوقت نفسه يفقد السوق عماله في مجالات اخري
وتصبح عمله نادره ومن المشاكل الاخري ايضا ان تفقد الحكومه احساس الموقع والمتاخ
فليس من المعقول ان تكون دوله تعتمد علي الصيد وتهتم الحكومه بالخرجين في مجال الزراعه وتدعم الصناعات الزراعيه
ولذالك يدخل المناخ والموقع كعامل مشترك في دعم سوق العمل والاتمام بالمجالات
التي تساعد علي النهوض بالبيئه ومن اكبر المشاكل ايضا ان يفقد الاتصال بين الشركات والعاملين فعند توفر فرصه عمل في
احدي الشركات لايستطيع العامل الحصول عليها وذالك لجهله بعدم وجود فرصه عمل
“وقل اعملوا فسيرا الله عملكم ورسوله والمومنين”

http://www.today-jobs.com

]]> By: PETER http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29625 PETER Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:55:14 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29625 There are different ways to work on the seo of our website. Either we can get lot of backlinks for our website or we can get quality backlinks. But this can be optimized by getting the right links than the volume. There are different ways to work on the seo of our website.
Either we can get lot of backlinks for our website or we can get quality backlinks. But this can be optimized by getting the right links than the volume.

]]> By: Presell Page Man http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29452 Presell Page Man Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:47:55 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29452 Hey Web Pula, not sure what you mean by "lowered PR" but it sounds like your friend put that "competitor site" into massive bad neighborhood, thereby getting their PR removed completely ... BUT what's your point pagerank wise? did the site rank worse because of this? Remember the whole article her does NOT talk about PR, and you should stop thinking and talking about PR as well Jim even pointed that out last year already and sent you here http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-bar/ did you read that one? best, presell page man Hey Web Pula,

not sure what you mean by “lowered PR” but it sounds like your friend put that “competitor site” into massive bad neighborhood, thereby getting their PR removed completely …

BUT what’s your point pagerank wise?
did the site rank worse because of this?

Remember the whole article her does NOT talk about PR, and you should stop thinking and talking about PR as well

Jim even pointed that out last year already and sent you here

http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-bar/

did you read that one?

best,
presell page man

]]> By: Web Pula http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29449 Web Pula Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:44:08 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29449 Hi everyone. Good article but you can cheat Google by pointing bad links towards competitive sites. One of my friends said that he hated one of those sites that ranked better than his one, in spite of that this site with less links had better PR than his one and he pointed bad links towards this site and lowered the PR of the competitive site. So it seems that Google is not using completely right strategy. Hi everyone. Good article but you can cheat Google by pointing bad links towards competitive sites. One of my friends said that he hated one of those sites that ranked better than his one, in spite of that this site with less links had better PR than his one and he pointed bad links towards this site and lowered the PR of the competitive site. So it seems that Google is not using completely right strategy.

]]> By: Good Point http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29235 Good Point Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:55:06 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29235 I think mini network and some relevant backlink are important to SEO more than number of backlink too. Thanks for the great article. I think mini network and some relevant backlink are important to SEO more than number of backlink too.

Thanks for the great article.

]]> By: 411 New York http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29171 411 New York Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:58:45 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29171 The first drawing was funny and made my coworker and I laugh but we got the point. It explain why our site up to a page rank of 4 in 2 months after creation and now is sitting at a rank or two. The first drawing was funny and made my coworker and I laugh but we got the point. It explain why our site up to a page rank of 4 in 2 months after creation and now is sitting at a rank or two.

]]> By: Vinyl Shutters http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29018 Vinyl Shutters Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:59:38 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/site-backlinks/#comment-29018 Question for Jim: I am in a small industry. I have tried using the common links tool to determine the "centers of the industry". The main problem I am having is that there are no sites that have more than 5 of the top 10 listed, and most of the sites that link to multiple (3) competitors are sites that are still sitting out there, but have nobody at the helm. I have tried everything - even phone calls to "retired" webmasters - to get my link in these "dead" sites that are apparently the center of the industry. Many of them have a broken submission form or an invalid email address on them, or I just get no reply. The only other "centers" I can find are directory websites, most of which are pretty shameful to be listed in, or charge some outrageous fee to be listed in. One of these "centers" was DMOZ, who apparently doesn not want to list me because I submitted my request 6 months ago and I am still not in there. Some of my competitors have 3 links in there even though they say that is against their TOS. Considering there are NO other PR8 sites that are related to my industry, this seems like a significant place to get listed, but no can do. I know it sounds strange, but what should a webmaster do if the centers of the industry are dead, but the industry itself is still alive? In my case, should I be seeking out the "live" sites that none of my competitors have found yet? Will Google consider me irrelevant if I do the work my competitors were too lazy to do? Should I try link exchanging with competitors' websites since they are really the only "centers" that still have someone maintaining them? Or should I be concentrating on quantity of links to beat out these "dead" listings that they all share? Question for Jim:

I am in a small industry. I have tried using the common links tool to determine the “centers of the industry”. The main problem I am having is that there are no sites that have more than 5 of the top 10 listed, and most of the sites that link to multiple (3) competitors are sites that are still sitting out there, but have nobody at the helm.

I have tried everything - even phone calls to “retired” webmasters - to get my link in these “dead” sites that are apparently the center of the industry. Many of them have a broken submission form or an invalid email address on them, or I just get no reply. The only other “centers” I can find are directory websites, most of which are pretty shameful to be listed in, or charge some outrageous fee to be listed in.

One of these “centers” was DMOZ, who apparently doesn not want to list me because I submitted my request 6 months ago and I am still not in there. Some of my competitors have 3 links in there even though they say that is against their TOS. Considering there are NO other PR8 sites that are related to my industry, this seems like a significant place to get listed, but no can do.

I know it sounds strange, but what should a webmaster do if the centers of the industry are dead, but the industry itself is still alive? In my case, should I be seeking out the “live” sites that none of my competitors have found yet? Will Google consider me irrelevant if I do the work my competitors were too lazy to do? Should I try link exchanging with competitors’ websites since they are really the only “centers” that still have someone maintaining them? Or should I be concentrating on quantity of links to beat out these “dead” listings that they all share?

]]>