<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question: 2 URL&#8217;s - Same Content - best methods?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>Hi there
Im the client, I just wanted to thank Jim and everyone that replied to this problem, you were a great help and Im going to print that article posted by Nick now and sort this out!
Cheers
Sarah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there<br />
Im the client, I just wanted to thank Jim and everyone that replied to this problem, you were a great help and Im going to print that article posted by Nick now and sort this out!<br />
Cheers<br />
Sarah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Wilsdon</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Wilsdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>No problem Jim - I know you're happy to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem Jim - I know you&#8217;re happy to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>Thanks everyone - esp Nick! 
Nick, thanks for sharing your knowledge freely here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone - esp Nick!<br />
Nick, thanks for sharing your knowledge freely here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Wilsdon</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Wilsdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>Sorry Jim - the wife dragged me away from work for a while :)

Yes domain masking would work (as Murugan writes) but that's more a solution tailored to the visitor than the search engines IMO.  You would then have to put a robots.txt on the blablabla.com site to avoid the duplicate filter knocking the new greatbla.com out of the index (presuming the latter has less link popularity etc. but if it's one of your famous golden oldies Jim this could get very interesting!). 

I have a gut feeling though that a hand-brake stop like that would not be great in regard to the sandbox. 

I actually got pointed to an article Scottie wrote on this and I've been waiting to try it out myself. She suggests initially using a 302 and then moving over to a 301 at the final stage. 

http://www.highrankings.com/issue142.htm#guest

I'd love to know how that went though ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Jim - the wife dragged me away from work for a while <img src='http://www.jimboykin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yes domain masking would work (as Murugan writes) but that&#8217;s more a solution tailored to the visitor than the search engines IMO.  You would then have to put a robots.txt on the blablabla.com site to avoid the duplicate filter knocking the new greatbla.com out of the index (presuming the latter has less link popularity etc. but if it&#8217;s one of your famous golden oldies Jim this could get very interesting!). </p>
<p>I have a gut feeling though that a hand-brake stop like that would not be great in regard to the sandbox. </p>
<p>I actually got pointed to an article Scottie wrote on this and I&#8217;ve been waiting to try it out myself. She suggests initially using a 302 and then moving over to a 301 at the final stage. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.highrankings.com/issue142.htm#guest" rel="nofollow nofollow">http://www.highrankings.com/issue142.htm#guest</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to know how that went though <img src='http://www.jimboykin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>Yea, I'm not a fan of doing the 301 on an existing website that currently ranks well. I've heard too many problems with time delays. Who trusts a 301 to seamlessly flow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I&#8217;m not a fan of doing the 301 on an existing website that currently ranks well. I&#8217;ve heard too many problems with time delays. Who trusts a 301 to seamlessly flow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kb</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>kb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>I did a 301 from high ranking olddomain.com to newdomain.com last June and the site didn't crawl out of the sandbox until November.

There was a big thread on WMW about 301 redirects and the sandbox late last year.  Many people reporting having a similar experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a 301 from high ranking olddomain.com to newdomain.com last June and the site didn&#8217;t crawl out of the sandbox until November.</p>
<p>There was a big thread on WMW about 301 redirects and the sandbox late last year.  Many people reporting having a similar experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murugan Ranganathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Murugan Ranganathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>domain forwarding with url masking will do good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>domain forwarding with url masking will do good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>I agree that 301 redirect is good idea, but that about the Sandbox?

As far as I know the new domain will get sandboxes (at least according to my experience it happened 2 or 3 times when I tried out this way).

Is there a way to avoid Sandbox while transferring a website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that 301 redirect is good idea, but that about the Sandbox?</p>
<p>As far as I know the new domain will get sandboxes (at least according to my experience it happened 2 or 3 times when I tried out this way).</p>
<p>Is there a way to avoid Sandbox while transferring a website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>The 301 will work fine. I only doubt with one thing, domain age, but i think 301 should redirect popularity and other values for SE algorythm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 301 will work fine. I only doubt with one thing, domain age, but i think 301 should redirect popularity and other values for SE algorythm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Henshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 03:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/question-2-urls-same-content-best-methods/#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>I'm 90% confident that you can do a 301 from the old higher ranking domain to the new one, and Google will adjust accordingly, without your SERPs for those keywords/pages lowering. However, this may be a question to throw on Matt Cutt's blog. He's pretty good at answering questions like that if he's not too busy.

If it were me, I would simply do the 301, where it keeps the exact link and content, but switches out the domain with the new one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 90% confident that you can do a 301 from the old higher ranking domain to the new one, and Google will adjust accordingly, without your SERPs for those keywords/pages lowering. However, this may be a question to throw on Matt Cutt&#8217;s blog. He&#8217;s pretty good at answering questions like that if he&#8217;s not too busy.</p>
<p>If it were me, I would simply do the 301, where it keeps the exact link and content, but switches out the domain with the new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
