Comments on: If it’s not a Pagerank 4 or higher, it’s worthless. http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/ Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building. Tue, 20 May 2008 19:02:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: iporter http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-29626 iporter Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:26:25 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-29626 Yeah it's important not to get bogged down with Page Rank, but I'd say it's also true that any site that's integrated into it's link community is likely to have page rank. So if a site doesn't, it's certainly a warning flag, and reasonable to question the value of working for a link from said site. Yeah it’s important not to get bogged down with Page Rank, but I’d say it’s also true that any site that’s integrated into it’s link community is likely to have page rank. So if a site doesn’t, it’s certainly a warning flag, and reasonable to question the value of working for a link from said site.

]]> By: idearius http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-29459 idearius Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:09:42 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-29459 This comes really late from the date of the original post, but I find strange that nobody elaborated on the sometimes huge differences between the Alexa rank and the Google Pagerank. Let me provide an example from websites that have been online since about 1996. They are the three most popular commercial air TV channels in Uruguay (South America), the first one with a .com domain name and the rest with country-level domain names, have these ranks and backlinks in Google: Channel 12: PR=5, AR=75,058, GBL=413. Channel 04: PR=6, AR=204,763; GBL=57. Channel 10: PR=5, AR=147,387, GBL=62. The numbers support that the amount of backlinks is directly proportional to the popularity of a website, but the curious thing is that the Alexa rank, not Google's, seem to better represent that. For optimum search engine optimization tracking I do register these and other factors, but it seems amazing to have such a big difference in Alexa not showing up in Google. This comes really late from the date of the original post, but I find strange that nobody elaborated on the sometimes huge differences between the Alexa rank and the Google Pagerank.

Let me provide an example from websites that have been online since about 1996. They are the three most popular commercial air TV channels in Uruguay (South America), the first one with a .com domain name and the rest with country-level domain names, have these ranks and backlinks in Google:

Channel 12: PR=5, AR=75,058, GBL=413.
Channel 04: PR=6, AR=204,763; GBL=57.
Channel 10: PR=5, AR=147,387, GBL=62.

The numbers support that the amount of backlinks is directly proportional to the popularity of a website, but the curious thing is that the Alexa rank, not Google’s, seem to better represent that. For optimum search engine optimization tracking I do register these and other factors, but it seems amazing to have such a big difference in Alexa not showing up in Google.

]]> By: Hannes http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-28977 Hannes Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:33:33 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-28977 At least this site's pagerank is 4, so it's not worthless ;-) At least this site’s pagerank is 4, so it’s not worthless ;-)

]]> By: Kelvin http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-28976 Kelvin Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:17:12 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-28976 Google should take away their Page Rank crap or replace something else. That will turn SEO industry upside down and shuffle. For those link selling for money become useless. How nice is that Google should take away their Page Rank crap or replace something else. That will turn SEO industry upside down and shuffle.
For those link selling for money become useless. How nice is that

]]> By: Sandeep http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-28681 Sandeep Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:23:49 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-28681 What you really think is that we should not buy links ??? Than how we could optimize our site for a Google Indexing???????? Please describe with details. I want to optimize my site www.googlewebstore.com ; but I dont know hoe to do it ??? What you really think is that we should not buy links ??? Than how we could optimize our site for a Google Indexing???????? Please describe with details. I want to optimize my site http://www.googlewebstore.com ; but I dont know hoe to do it ???

]]> By: alternatif http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-26389 alternatif Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:14:47 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-26389 PR is definitely not the only thing to consider when looking at a certain webpage. The content and the context are much more relevant than the PR. The better the context, the better the result! PR is definitely not the only thing to consider when looking at a certain webpage. The content and the context are much more relevant than the PR. The better the context, the better the result!

]]> By: What I learned about Search Engine Optimisation Today… - Hobo SEO UK http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-25833 What I learned about Search Engine Optimisation Today… - Hobo SEO UK Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:34:35 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-25833 [...] If it’s not a Pagerank 4 or higher, it’s worthless [...] [...] If it’s not a Pagerank 4 or higher, it’s worthless [...]

]]> By: OOM http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-25306 OOM Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:23:04 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-25306 PR is definitely not the only thing to consider when looking at a certain webpage. The content and the context are much more relevant than the PR. The better the context, the better the result! PR is definitely not the only thing to consider when looking at a certain webpage. The content and the context are much more relevant than the PR. The better the context, the better the result!

]]> By: 叶容秋 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-25230 叶容秋 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:34:43 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-25230 123456789/* 123456789/*

]]> By: Bret heart bobby http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-25216 Bret heart bobby Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:10:49 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/pagerank-4/#comment-25216 PR plays a important role in SERP....Higher the PR, better is the site. But our main aim is to improve our business by improving traffic. But when a visitor comes to our site the first impression he gets about our site form its Page rank of the home page. most probably people dont like to visit the website which has pr4 or below PR plays a important role in SERP….Higher the PR, better is the site.
But our main aim is to improve our business by improving traffic.
But when a visitor comes to our site the first impression he gets about our site form its Page
rank of the home page.
most probably people dont like to visit the website which has pr4 or below

]]>