<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links Within Content, Linking to Content   &#8230;.   a Rant.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Shirilla</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-29691</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Shirilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-29691</guid>
		<description>I do the Link building for our sites and now believe I am that "monkey " Jim was talking about.

Thanks for the redirection</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do the Link building for our sites and now believe I am that &#8220;monkey &#8221; Jim was talking about.</p>
<p>Thanks for the redirection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirCommy</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-26352</link>
		<dc:creator>SirCommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-26352</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, quite a rare one I might add, considering it holds ‘the truth’. Unfortunately, there are too many “experts” and “companies” which offer SEO and link services and so, hundreds of people are being fooled everyday with their inefficient services. So yes, I can agree, links MUST come from relevant and similar content, it is a MUST HAVE, most huge search engines out there ‘can’ determine content from the links, the ways of reading popularity has changed and advanced massively. Therefore, ‘stop’ linking like a monkey, as how Jim wisely stated. But one thing is for sure, there will always be people that blindly go for such services, and let me mention one of them here. The renown ‘Get 10.000 visitors’ with 8$ or 10$. Do you ‘honestly’ believe someone will send that amount of real visitors for that cash? Those are scripts which “visit” your site from multiple domains/IPs, no wonder they do not guarantee signups or purchases, HELLO! So what I am trying to say, either DOCUMENT yourself before accepting such services or just do it yourself the old way, which is still the strongest.
Good article, Jim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, quite a rare one I might add, considering it holds ‘the truth’. Unfortunately, there are too many “experts” and “companies” which offer SEO and link services and so, hundreds of people are being fooled everyday with their inefficient services. So yes, I can agree, links MUST come from relevant and similar content, it is a MUST HAVE, most huge search engines out there ‘can’ determine content from the links, the ways of reading popularity has changed and advanced massively. Therefore, ‘stop’ linking like a monkey, as how Jim wisely stated. But one thing is for sure, there will always be people that blindly go for such services, and let me mention one of them here. The renown ‘Get 10.000 visitors’ with 8$ or 10$. Do you ‘honestly’ believe someone will send that amount of real visitors for that cash? Those are scripts which “visit” your site from multiple domains/IPs, no wonder they do not guarantee signups or purchases, HELLO! So what I am trying to say, either DOCUMENT yourself before accepting such services or just do it yourself the old way, which is still the strongest.<br />
Good article, Jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler dewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-23865</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler dewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-23865</guid>
		<description>I like this post, practically learn everything from reading you blog. If no one can't understand what your talking aobut then I guess they don't have the iq or maybe there newer. I was trying to explain something similar to some girl the other day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this post, practically learn everything from reading you blog. If no one can&#8217;t understand what your talking aobut then I guess they don&#8217;t have the iq or maybe there newer. I was trying to explain something similar to some girl the other day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Google Find and Spank your Paid Links? - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-15347</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Google Find and Spank your Paid Links? - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-15347</guid>
		<description>[...] Think Stealth. Think Ninja Links. In November of 2005 I mentioned Links within content linking to content which I still highly believe in to this day.In December of 2005 I wrote more advice which again is still worth heeding &#34;Buy Links Under the Radar where Matt can&#8217;t find them.&#34;Then in October 2006 I talked about my own Google God in my Head, and what it tells me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Think Stealth. Think Ninja Links. In November of 2005 I mentioned Links within content linking to content which I still highly believe in to this day.In December of 2005 I wrote more advice which again is still worth heeding &quot;Buy Links Under the Radar where Matt can&#8217;t find them.&quot;Then in October 2006 I talked about my own Google God in my Head, and what it tells me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Bash &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ding! You&#8217;ve got homework!</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-13065</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Bash &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ding! You&#8217;ve got homework!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-13065</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ll be discussing this &#8216;article&#8217; technique in my presentation on link development, these articles are commonly called presell pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ll be discussing this &#8216;article&#8217; technique in my presentation on link development, these articles are commonly called presell pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Money Gurus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 101 Ways to Build Link Popularity</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-10529</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Money Gurus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 101 Ways to Build Link Popularity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-10529</guid>
		<description>[...] 56. In case you didn&#8217;t get the memo — when swapping links, try to get links from within the content of relevant content pages. Do not try to get links from pages that list hundreds of off topic link partners. Only seek link exchanges that you would consider pursuing even if search engines did not exist. Instead of thinking just about your topic when exchanging links, think about demographic audience sets. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 56. In case you didn&#8217;t get the memo — when swapping links, try to get links from within the content of relevant content pages. Do not try to get links from pages that list hundreds of off topic link partners. Only seek link exchanges that you would consider pursuing even if search engines did not exist. Instead of thinking just about your topic when exchanging links, think about demographic audience sets. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cherry Picking Links - SEO Shortcuts - SEO Hotline</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-9756</link>
		<dc:creator>Cherry Picking Links - SEO Shortcuts - SEO Hotline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-9756</guid>
		<description>[...] Make sure all links are in-content. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Make sure all links are in-content. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putting a Price on a Link - Jim&#8217;s Value Indicators. - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-8907</link>
		<dc:creator>Putting a Price on a Link - Jim&#8217;s Value Indicators. - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-8907</guid>
		<description>[...] Keep in mind that we don&#8217;t go for homepage links (99% only powerful subpages), and we work on getting links within the content area of webpages (something that looks like this), and sometimes we add co-citation (something I don&#8217;t want to talk about today). And yes, if we can get our ads above the fold, with a nice banner to boot, that&#8217;s even better (but not always possible). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Keep in mind that we don&#8217;t go for homepage links (99% only powerful subpages), and we work on getting links within the content area of webpages (something that looks like this), and sometimes we add co-citation (something I don&#8217;t want to talk about today). And yes, if we can get our ads above the fold, with a nice banner to boot, that&#8217;s even better (but not always possible). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday Night Link Request Spammer Fun. - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-8550</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday Night Link Request Spammer Fun. - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-8550</guid>
		<description>[...] My Response: Jeremy,Sure, I can place you link on any of these pages:www.jimboykin.com/what-a-links-page-should-not-look-like/www.jimboykin.com/manual-vs-software-link-building-and-management/www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/choose 1 and let me know.Jim [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My Response: Jeremy,Sure, I can place you link on any of these pages:www.jimboykin.com/what-a-links-page-should-not-look-like/www.jimboykin.com/manual-vs-software-link-building-and-management/www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/choose 1 and let me know.Jim [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy and Aaron&#8217;s 101 Link Building Tips Explored (Part 2)-- Link Builder&#8217;s Union</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-8258</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy and Aaron&#8217;s 101 Link Building Tips Explored (Part 2)-- Link Builder&#8217;s Union</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/links-within-content-linking-to-content-a-rant/#comment-8258</guid>
		<description>[...] 56. In case you didn&#8217;t get the memo — when swapping links, try to get links from within the content of relevant content pages. Do not try to get links from pages that list hundreds of off topic link partners. Only seek link exchanges that you would consider pursuing even if search engines did not exist. Instead of thinking just about your topic when exchanging links, think about demographic audience sets. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 56. In case you didn&#8217;t get the memo — when swapping links, try to get links from within the content of relevant content pages. Do not try to get links from pages that list hundreds of off topic link partners. Only seek link exchanges that you would consider pursuing even if search engines did not exist. Instead of thinking just about your topic when exchanging links, think about demographic audience sets. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
