<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Find if a Page is in Google&#8217;s Secret Supplemental Results.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Everyting You Ever Wanted To Know About SEO &#124; SEOpsCentre</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-29918</link>
		<dc:creator>Everyting You Ever Wanted To Know About SEO &#124; SEOpsCentre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-29918</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve seen a lot of talk about &#8220;Supplemental Result Index Hell&#8221; and, as Michael points out, links from supplemental pages don&#8217;t pass value, but since last summer Google have stopped labeling which results in the SERPs come from the supplemental index and have claimed that the distinctions between the supplemental and main index are &#8220;continuing to narrow.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve done a bit of hunting around and the clearest explanation I&#8217;ve been able to find is a post by Jim Boykin about How to Find if a Page is in Google’s Secret Supplemental Results.  Jim&#8217;s post is from around the same time last year when Google made the change and I&#8217;m still wondering whether anyone&#8217;s come up with a more precise method to find a definitive answer to the index status of a page. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve seen a lot of talk about &#8220;Supplemental Result Index Hell&#8221; and, as Michael points out, links from supplemental pages don&#8217;t pass value, but since last summer Google have stopped labeling which results in the SERPs come from the supplemental index and have claimed that the distinctions between the supplemental and main index are &#8220;continuing to narrow.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve done a bit of hunting around and the clearest explanation I&#8217;ve been able to find is a post by Jim Boykin about How to Find if a Page is in Google’s Secret Supplemental Results.  Jim&#8217;s post is from around the same time last year when Google made the change and I&#8217;m still wondering whether anyone&#8217;s come up with a more precise method to find a definitive answer to the index status of a page. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of Jim - 2007. - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-26580</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of Jim - 2007. - Jim Boykin&#8217;s Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-26580</guid>
		<description>[...] How to Find if a Page is in Google&#8217;s Secret Supplemental Results. August 1, 2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to Find if a Page is in Google&rsquo;s Secret Supplemental Results. August 1, 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Marketing Digest - The State of the Supplemental Index (And What You Should Know About It) - KoMarketing Associates</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-25206</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Marketing Digest - The State of the Supplemental Index (And What You Should Know About It) - KoMarketing Associates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-25206</guid>
		<description>[...] Jim Boykin has a very good post on checking contextual indicators related to your website that may lead to the identification of supplemental results. The summary is this: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jim Boykin has a very good post on checking contextual indicators related to your website that may lead to the identification of supplemental results. The summary is this: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrickHudson</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-24188</link>
		<dc:creator>patrickHudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-24188</guid>
		<description>Hi, the post was a very interesting one. Especially for the guys like me . I had read about How to Find if a Page is in Google’s Secret Supplemental Results. I don't Know how much will be more effective. But anyway thanks for such an interesting post. If it works for me then it is great. Thank you.

Have a nice day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, the post was a very interesting one. Especially for the guys like me . I had read about How to Find if a Page is in Google’s Secret Supplemental Results. I don&#8217;t Know how much will be more effective. But anyway thanks for such an interesting post. If it works for me then it is great. Thank you.</p>
<p>Have a nice day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: August &#8216;07: Best Search/Marketing Posts &#187; Small Business SEM</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-24017</link>
		<dc:creator>August &#8216;07: Best Search/Marketing Posts &#187; Small Business SEM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-24017</guid>
		<description>[...] Jim Boykin: How to Find if a Page is in Google’s Secret Supplemental Results. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jim Boykin: How to Find if a Page is in Google’s Secret Supplemental Results. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23703</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23703</guid>
		<description>I got a new site, and it went to supplemental even though it's got all unique content. What I never understand about google is why it keeps some pages (which are formatted very similarly except for different content, page title, meta tags) and it dumps others into its now secret supplemental results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a new site, and it went to supplemental even though it&#8217;s got all unique content. What I never understand about google is why it keeps some pages (which are formatted very similarly except for different content, page title, meta tags) and it dumps others into its now secret supplemental results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Marketing Blog - KoMarketing Associates</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23641</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Marketing Blog - KoMarketing Associates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23641</guid>
		<description>[...] Jim Boykin has a very good post on checking contextual indicators related to your website that may lead to the identification of supplemental results. The summary is this: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jim Boykin has a very good post on checking contextual indicators related to your website that may lead to the identification of supplemental results. The summary is this: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HELM, WHM/cPanel, Windows, Linux and SEO Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SearchCap: The Day In Search, August 1, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23533</link>
		<dc:creator>HELM, WHM/cPanel, Windows, Linux and SEO Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SearchCap: The Day In Search, August 1, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 04:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23533</guid>
		<description>[...] How to Find if a Page is in Google&#8217;s Secret Supplemental Results, Jim Boykin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to Find if a Page is in Google&#8217;s Secret Supplemental Results, Jim Boykin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supplemental Results a Thing of the Past. : Eric on Search</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23527</link>
		<dc:creator>Supplemental Results a Thing of the Past. : Eric on Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23527</guid>
		<description>[...] Google tends not to want webmasters to focus on certain things (pay no attention to the man behind the screen)&#8230;but that is EXACTLY what those who optimize sites are paid to do. We must understand not only what is being done, but the effect it will have. I think Jim Boykins latest discussion of &#8221; How to detect supplementals&#8221; in the new label free world of Google is a good start. Hopefully this link will keep his page out of them. (grin). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google tends not to want webmasters to focus on certain things (pay no attention to the man behind the screen)&#8230;but that is EXACTLY what those who optimize sites are paid to do. We must understand not only what is being done, but the effect it will have. I think Jim Boykins latest discussion of &#8221; How to detect supplementals&#8221; in the new label free world of Google is a good start. Hopefully this link will keep his page out of them. (grin). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inventive Design &#124; Mitä saatoit menettää loman aikana</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23509</link>
		<dc:creator>Inventive Design &#124; Mitä saatoit menettää loman aikana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 08:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/google-supplemental-results/#comment-23509</guid>
		<description>[...] Myös Jim Boykin kertoo miten tunnistaa supplemental indeksiin joutuneet sivut. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Myös Jim Boykin kertoo miten tunnistaa supplemental indeksiin joutuneet sivut. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
