Comments on: Matt: It’s ours! We’ve stolen the precious Google algo from the ‘plex. http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/ Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building. Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:15:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Yuri http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8123 Yuri Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:21:25 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8123 So you too think that God is a Woman? <blockquote> n our head….we all have in image of what She wants from us, </blockquote> And they said that "Dogma" was too controversial and heretical. So you too think that God is a Woman?

n our head….we all have in image of what She wants from us,

And they said that “Dogma” was too controversial and heretical.

]]> By: ering http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8072 ering Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:40:41 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8072 Oh, I see. Thanks a lot!! Oh, I see. Thanks a lot!!

]]> By: B-Scan http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8061 B-Scan Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:22:47 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8061 Theoretical, that you have the algo today, tomorrow it will be diferent. You need more than "one day" to catch up the missing parts. Theoretical, that you have the algo today, tomorrow it will be diferent. You need more than “one day” to catch up the missing parts.

]]> By: Oleg http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8053 Oleg Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:44:18 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8053 I still thiink knowing the Google algo would be great to know. I liked how they simplified the weight1 * signal1 ... If any of us knew the weights, then you could base you site around the heavier ones. I still thiink knowing the Google algo would be great to know. I liked how they simplified the weight1 * signal1 … If any of us knew the weights, then you could base you site around the heavier ones.

]]> By: Brian Turner http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8051 Brian Turner Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:27:05 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8051 The trouble with knowing the algo in one moment is that it seems to change too variably for any long term advantage. I know there are short-term business models that could maybe make something of it - but factors such as "trust" and similar would be hard to purchase, and likelihood is people who might gain on knowing the algo already chase major factors anyway. 2c. The trouble with knowing the algo in one moment is that it seems to change too variably for any long term advantage.

I know there are short-term business models that could maybe make something of it - but factors such as “trust” and similar would be hard to purchase, and likelihood is people who might gain on knowing the algo already chase major factors anyway.

2c.

]]> By: George http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8050 George Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:29:49 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8050 They are mistaking. If we've got Google Algorthym we would be just new owners of Google. Nothing more. Nothing "ruling" :) They are mistaking. If we’ve got Google Algorthym we would be just new owners of Google. Nothing more. Nothing “ruling” :)

]]> By: Spencer Hoyt http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8045 Spencer Hoyt Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:25:58 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8045 This is one of the best post that I have read in a while! Thanks Jim Quad - We are not saying that you wouldn't see an advantage by "Knowing" the Algo but it probably would not be a night and day difference than most people current practices. This is one of the best post that I have read in a while!
Thanks Jim

Quad - We are not saying that you wouldn’t see an advantage by “Knowing” the Algo but it probably would not be a night and day difference than most people current practices.

]]> By: quadszilla http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8042 quadszilla Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:56:06 +0000 http://www.jimboykin.com/google-algorthym/#comment-8042 This whole discussion is crazy. How can any SEO say that having the algorythm would not make them millions of dollars richer? I honestly don't understand where you guys are coming from on this one and would glady pay $500k for an exclusive copy of todays google algorythm. This whole discussion is crazy. How can any SEO say that having the algorythm would not make them millions of dollars richer?

I honestly don’t understand where you guys are coming from on this one and would glady pay $500k for an exclusive copy of todays google algorythm.

]]>