<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First clues to Jagger Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimboykin.com/first-clues-to-jagger-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/first-clues-to-jagger-update/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO, and Link Building.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BarcodeBulldog</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/first-clues-to-jagger-update/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>BarcodeBulldog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/first-clues-to-jagger-update/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Google's quest to make informational sites the highest ranking in the SERPs dovetails with adwords, adsense and Froogle. Unfortunately, it looks like they're single-handedly trying to change the nature of the web though.

The question will be whether Google searchers will be happy with the shift as I'd wager that a large percentage of users have come to count on search engine results to identify suppliers and to comparison shop. Will that mean they'll take their searches elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s quest to make informational sites the highest ranking in the SERPs dovetails with adwords, adsense and Froogle. Unfortunately, it looks like they&#8217;re single-handedly trying to change the nature of the web though.</p>
<p>The question will be whether Google searchers will be happy with the shift as I&#8217;d wager that a large percentage of users have come to count on search engine results to identify suppliers and to comparison shop. Will that mean they&#8217;ll take their searches elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Publishing Blog &#187; Google&#8217;s recent update shakes up rankings again</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/first-clues-to-jagger-update/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Publishing Blog &#187; Google&#8217;s recent update shakes up rankings again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/first-clues-to-jagger-update/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>[...] You may have noticed Pagerank changes on some of your sites.This update, nicknamed &#8220;Jagger&#8221; appears to have shaken things up a bit (but not too much &#8212; I haven&#8217;t heard anyone complaining yet.) Jim Boykin&#8217;s Blog has been following this update very closely. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You may have noticed Pagerank changes on some of your sites.This update, nicknamed &#8220;Jagger&#8221; appears to have shaken things up a bit (but not too much &#8212; I haven&#8217;t heard anyone complaining yet.) Jim Boykin&#8217;s Blog has been following this update very closely. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Jagger da un sesgo informativo a la búsqueda de Google?</title>
		<link>http://www.jimboykin.com/first-clues-to-jagger-update/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Jagger da un sesgo informativo a la búsqueda de Google?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimboykin.com/first-clues-to-jagger-update/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] Jim Boykin’s Internet Marketing Blog » First clues to Jagger Update (traduccion mía ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jim Boykin’s Internet Marketing Blog » First clues to Jagger Update (traduccion mía ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
